Prompt Run Results

Project: Task A Structure Analyser

Completed
← Back to Project View All Runs Start New Run
Run Summary
Prompt Version:
v1 - Initial prompt
AI Model:
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Duration:
27s
Created:
2026-01-31 07:58
Temperature:
0.0
Max Response Tokens:
8,192
Top-K:
1
Top-P:
Not set
Thinking Configuration:
8192 tokens

1

Total Items

1

Successful

0

Failed

1

Processed
Total Tokens: 8,030
Prompt Tokens: 5,800
Response Tokens: 371
Thoughts Tokens: 1,859
Avg Log Probability: 53.90%
Safety Ratings: N/A
Evaluation Summary

Field-by-field evaluation of generated vs expected output

Field Path Type & Match Criterion Total Matches Match Rate Precision Recall F1 Similarity
structure.body.feedback text-similarity Sim≥70% 1 1 100.0% — — — 73%
structure.body.score exact-match 1 0 0.0% — — — —
structure.conclusion.feedback text-similarity Sim≥70% 1 0 0.0% — — — 66%
structure.conclusion.score exact-match 1 1 100.0% — — — —
structure.introduction.feedback text-similarity Sim≥70% 1 1 100.0% — — — 91%
structure.introduction.score exact-match 1 1 100.0% — — — —
structure.score exact-match 1 0 0.0% — — — —
Responses for the Golden Items (1)

Click a field in the Evaluation Summary to view detailed comparisons

Science Essay ↗ 57.14% · 4/7 fields matched
8,030 tokens
Field & Match Criterion Expected Output Generated Output Evaluation Metrics
✓ structure.body.feedback
string
Match: Similarity ≥ 70%
The body paragraphs generally follow the TEEL structure well, with good emphasis on the explanation section. However, paragraph 3 is way too evidence heavy and not enough explanation or elaboration focused.
The body of your essay demonstrates an outstanding use of the TEEL structure in all three paragraphs. Each paragraph begins with a clear Topic sentence that directly corresponds to the arguments outlined in your introduction. You effectively use Evidence, such as the reference to Noam Chomsky or F.A. Hayek, to support your claims. The Elaboration in each paragraph is the strongest feature, as you dedicate significant space to explaining the mechanisms and reasoning behind your arguments. Finally, each paragraph concludes with a clear Linking sentence that summarizes the point and ties it back to your main contention.
Similarity: 73%
✗ structure.body.score
string
Match: Exact equality
Good
Excellent
 Exact Match
✗ structure.conclusion.feedback
string
Match: Similarity ≥ 70%
The conclusion is short and succinct, has a summary of the essay's arguments and contention. Just saying again: The conclusion is short and succinct, has a summary of the essay's arguments and contention.
Your conclusion provides a model of effective structure. It begins by clearly restating your main contention, followed by a succinct summary of the three main arguments from your body paragraphs. Crucially, you end with a powerful and relevant call to action, urging society to 'remove the stigma' of social sciences not being a science. This elevates the conclusion beyond a simple summary and leaves a lasting impression on the reader without introducing new arguments.
Similarity: 66%
✓ structure.conclusion.score
string
Match: Exact equality
Excellent
Excellent
 Exact Match
✓ structure.introduction.feedback
string
Match: Similarity ≥ 70%
The introduction had a clear contention (that social sciences are not a science) and this contention was clearly related to the quotes (where the theme was science). The introduction also gave some engaging context and a brief summary of the 3 body paragraphs or arguments that were used in the essay.
Your introduction is structured excellently. It begins with a strong context statement that frames the debate around the scientific method's application to social sciences. You then present a very clear and direct contention that the social sciences are not a science. This is perfectly followed by a concise summary of the three arguments that will form the body of your essay. The introduction is succinct, impactful, and provides a perfect roadmap for the reader.
Similarity: 91%
✓ structure.introduction.score
string
Match: Exact equality
Excellent
Excellent
 Exact Match
✗ structure.score
string
Match: Exact equality
Very Good
Excellent
 Exact Match
View Response Metadata
Finish Reason:
STOP
Avg Log Probability:
53.90%
Safety Rating:
N/A
Usage Metadata: 
{
  "trafficType": "ON_DEMAND",
  "totalTokenCount": 8030,
  "promptTokenCount": 5800,
  "thoughtsTokenCount": 1859,
  "promptTokensDetails": [
    {
      "modality": "TEXT",
      "tokenCount": 5800
    }
  ],
  "candidatesTokenCount": 371,
  "candidatesTokensDetails": [
    {
      "modality": "TEXT",
      "tokenCount": 371
    }
  ]
}