Prompt Run Results
Project: Overall Essay Marker V1
Completed
Run Summary
Prompt Version:
v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1
AI Model:
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Duration:
37s
Created:
2026-02-01 00:43
Temperature:
0.0
Max Response Tokens:
8,192
Top-K:
1
Top-P:
Not set
Thinking Configuration:
8192 tokens
1
Total Items1
Successful0
Failed1
Processed
Total Tokens:
8,230
Prompt Tokens:
4,861
Response Tokens:
596
Thoughts Tokens:
2,773
Avg Log Probability:
47.03%
Safety Ratings:
N/A
Evaluation Summary
Field-by-field evaluation of generated vs expected output
| Field Path | Type & Match Criterion | Total | Matches | Match Rate | Precision | Recall | F1 | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
overall.score |
exact-match | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
Responses for the Golden Items (1)
Click a field in the Evaluation Summary to view detailed comparisons
8,230 tokens
| Field & Match Criterion | Expected Output | Generated Output | Evaluation Metrics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — |
body.paragraphs.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The content of your body paragraphs is good, as you thoughtfully engage with the prompts to argue that factors like safety and purpose are integral to long-term business success. However, the structure is poor and significantly weakens your essay. The paragraphs do not consistently follow the TEEL (Topic, Evidence, Elaboration, Link) structure. For instance, your second paragraph introduces two separate ideas (technology and meritocracy) and functions more as a setup than a focused argument. To improve, ensure each body paragraph begins with a single, clear topic sentence that presents an argument supporting your main contention. Follow this with evidence, a detailed elaboration on the logic of your argument, and a strong linking sentence that connects the paragraph's point back to your overall thesis. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
body.paragraphs.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Poor |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The content of your final paragraph is excellent. It provides a sophisticated and powerful concluding thought that effectively synthesises the essay's core themes of technology, merit, and inclusion into a humane vision of success. However, its structure is unconventional as it functions as both a final body paragraph and a conclusion. While the concluding statement is strong, a dedicated conclusion should ideally not introduce new argumentative layers. For a higher score, it is better to have a distinct conclusion that clearly restates your main contention and briefly summarises the arguments you have already made, providing a definitive end to your essay. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Good |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
Your introduction is structured perfectly. You begin with an engaging contextual hook that sets the scene of the modern business world, followed by a clear and insightful contention that a sole focus on profit undermines long-term success. You then effectively summarise the arguments you will explore. The paragraph is concise, logical, and provides the reader with a clear roadmap for the rest of the essay. The content is also strong, as your contention directly and thoughtfully addresses the tension within the provided prompts. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Excellent |
Not evaluated |
| — |
overall.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
This essay has a strong foundation with an excellent introduction and thoughtful ideas, but its potential is held back by significant structural weaknesses in the body and conclusion. Your contention is clear and you effectively synthesise the prompts. The main area for improvement is structure. You should focus on implementing the TEEL structure for your body paragraphs, ensuring each one is a distinct, self-contained argument. Additionally, create a dedicated conclusion that summarises your points and restates your thesis, rather than blending it with your final argument. Mastering this structure will allow your strong analytical content to be presented with greater clarity and impact, elevating your essays from 'Okay' to 'Excellent'. |
Not evaluated |
| ✓ |
overall.score
string Match: Exact equality |
Okay |
Okay |
Exact Match |
View Response Metadata
Finish Reason:
STOP
Avg Log Probability:
47.03%
Safety Rating:
N/A
Usage Metadata:
{
"trafficType": "ON_DEMAND",
"totalTokenCount": 8230,
"promptTokenCount": 4861,
"thoughtsTokenCount": 2773,
"promptTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 4861
}
],
"candidatesTokenCount": 596,
"candidatesTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 596
}
]
}