Angeline Business
Project: Overall Essay Marker V1
Text Assets (2)
Prompt
Text Asset 1
1. Information technology is at the core of how you do your business and how your business model itself evolves. 2. The bottom line is that any business should be a meritocracy. The best and brightest. Period. 3. The change I want to see is a start-up environment where everyone feels welcome and safe; where sexual harassment or discrimination will not impede great talent from producing great impact. 4. A business that makes nothing but money is a poor business.
Essay
Text Asset 2
With the increasingly rapid rate of progression of contemporary society, focus on innovation and the desire for individuals to be their ‘own boss’ has driven the exponential increase in the number of created businesses in recent times. Though each and every one of them has dreams of owning a successful business, it remains a fact that the majority of businesses fail to achieve enough success to become a long-term, financially stable business, with many failing in their first year. Factors such as the extent of which the advances in technology are utilised in business operations, and meritocratic ideals which reward the most capable individuals are currently prioritised. Yet these factors alone are insufficient. A business that only profit or performance risks undermining the human foundations on which long term success depends on. Information technology currently sits on the forefront of business models, shaping not only operation efficiency but strategic direction. The development and implementation of Artificial Intelligence only further urge prioritisation of technology as companies race to attain the latest technology and outperform their competitors. Similarly, the opinion that companies should function solely as a meritocracy reflects the desire to reward talent and maximise productivity. While these priorities can drive innovation and growth, particularly in global markets, implementing them without reflection may narrow opportunities for success and overlook structural barriers that prevent additional talent from emerging. True meritocracy cannot exist in environments where individuals feel unsafe of excluded. Discrimination and harassment can cause many issues such as distorting assessment of ability, silencing voices, minimising individual creativity and encouraging conformity. Thus, capable people who can further business aims are driven away. As such, creating workplaces where all employees feel welcome is not only an ethical priority but a practical necessity. Inclusion enables organisations to draw a greater pool of ideas and experiences, strengthening creativity and innovation in an increasingly competitive environment. Ultimately, businesses that define success solely in financial terms limit their opportunity and reveal their limited understanding in their social role. Profit is essential for survival but should not be the only focus. Organisations also shape the community, culture, and individual lives. Those who recognise ethical responsibilities beyond finance are more likely to earn community trust, sustain engagement, and produce a meaningful impact over time. In balancing technological advancement, merit, and inclusion, businesses move beyond self-interest models of success to one that is both successful and humane.
Expected Output
| Field | Expected Value | Match Threshold | In Overall Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
body.paragraphs.feedback
string
|
null | — | No |
body.paragraphs.score
string
|
null | — | No |
conclusion.feedback
string
|
null | — | No |
conclusion.score
string
|
null | — | No |
introduction.feedback
string
|
null | — | No |
introduction.score
string
|
null | — | No |
overall.feedback
string
|
null | — | No |
overall.score
string
|
Okay | — | Yes |
Prompt Runs Performance (2 runs)
Match rates shown are for this specific item, not overall run averages.
v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Temp: 0.0
Max: 8,192
100.0%
1/1 fields
8,404 tokens
2026-02-01 01:08
View Full Run →
v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Temp: 0.0
Max: 8,192
100.0%
1/1 fields
| Field & Match Criterion | Expected Output | Generated Output | Evaluation Metrics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — |
body.paragraphs.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The body paragraphs are the weakest section of the essay. The structure does not consistently follow the TEEL (Topic sentence, Evidence, Elaboration, Link) model. The first body paragraph, for instance, lacks a clear, argumentative topic sentence and reads more like a general discussion than a focused argument. The second body paragraph is better structured with a clearer topic sentence, but both paragraphs suffer from a significant lack of evidence. Arguments are made logically but are not substantiated with societal-level examples, studies, or historical context, which makes them feel like unsupported assertions. To improve, focus on dedicating each paragraph to a single, clear argument and backing it up with specific evidence before elaborating on its significance. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
body.paragraphs.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Poor |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The conclusion effectively performs its function. It begins by clearly restating the essay's main contention in a new way, avoiding simple repetition. It then successfully synthesizes the main themes discussed—balancing technology, merit, and inclusion—before offering a powerful and humane final thought. The structure is logical and concise, providing a satisfying end to the essay by reinforcing the core message that a successful business must also be a humane one. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Good |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
Your introduction is well-structured and effective. It starts with a relevant contextual hook, clearly establishes a nuanced contention that a business focused only on profit undermines its own success, and briefly outlines the arguments to be discussed. The contention is particularly strong as it thoughtfully synthesizes the themes from the prompts. The paragraph is also concise and clear, successfully setting the stage for the rest of the essay without wasting words. It correctly identifies the key components of a strong introduction. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Good |
Not evaluated |
| — |
overall.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
This essay presents a thoughtful and coherent contention, framed by a good introduction and a solid conclusion. However, the overall quality is brought down by the weakness in the body paragraphs, which are the most critical component of a GAMSAT essay. The arguments in the body lack clear structure and are not supported by evidence, which prevents the essay from being truly persuasive. To improve, you should continue to formulate nuanced contentions as you have done here. Your main focus for improvement should be on the body paragraphs: 1) Strictly adhere to the TEEL structure for each paragraph. 2) Ensure each paragraph has one clear argument. 3) Substantiate your claims with specific, real-world evidence to add weight and credibility to your analysis. |
Not evaluated |
| ✓ |
overall.score
string Match: Exact equality |
Okay |
Okay |
Exact Match |
View Response Metadata
Finish Reason:
STOP
Avg Log Probability:
45.23%
Safety Rating:
N/A
Usage Metadata:
{
"trafficType": "ON_DEMAND",
"totalTokenCount": 8404,
"promptTokenCount": 4861,
"thoughtsTokenCount": 2973,
"promptTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 4861
}
],
"candidatesTokenCount": 570,
"candidatesTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 570
}
]
}
v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Temp: 0.0
Max: 8,192
100.0%
1/1 fields
8,230 tokens
2026-02-01 00:43
View Full Run →
v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Temp: 0.0
Max: 8,192
100.0%
1/1 fields
| Field & Match Criterion | Expected Output | Generated Output | Evaluation Metrics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — |
body.paragraphs.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The content of your body paragraphs is good, as you thoughtfully engage with the prompts to argue that factors like safety and purpose are integral to long-term business success. However, the structure is poor and significantly weakens your essay. The paragraphs do not consistently follow the TEEL (Topic, Evidence, Elaboration, Link) structure. For instance, your second paragraph introduces two separate ideas (technology and meritocracy) and functions more as a setup than a focused argument. To improve, ensure each body paragraph begins with a single, clear topic sentence that presents an argument supporting your main contention. Follow this with evidence, a detailed elaboration on the logic of your argument, and a strong linking sentence that connects the paragraph's point back to your overall thesis. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
body.paragraphs.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Poor |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
The content of your final paragraph is excellent. It provides a sophisticated and powerful concluding thought that effectively synthesises the essay's core themes of technology, merit, and inclusion into a humane vision of success. However, its structure is unconventional as it functions as both a final body paragraph and a conclusion. While the concluding statement is strong, a dedicated conclusion should ideally not introduce new argumentative layers. For a higher score, it is better to have a distinct conclusion that clearly restates your main contention and briefly summarises the arguments you have already made, providing a definitive end to your essay. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
conclusion.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Good |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
Your introduction is structured perfectly. You begin with an engaging contextual hook that sets the scene of the modern business world, followed by a clear and insightful contention that a sole focus on profit undermines long-term success. You then effectively summarise the arguments you will explore. The paragraph is concise, logical, and provides the reader with a clear roadmap for the rest of the essay. The content is also strong, as your contention directly and thoughtfully addresses the tension within the provided prompts. |
Not evaluated |
| — |
introduction.score
string Not evaluated |
null |
Excellent |
Not evaluated |
| — |
overall.feedback
string Not evaluated |
null |
This essay has a strong foundation with an excellent introduction and thoughtful ideas, but its potential is held back by significant structural weaknesses in the body and conclusion. Your contention is clear and you effectively synthesise the prompts. The main area for improvement is structure. You should focus on implementing the TEEL structure for your body paragraphs, ensuring each one is a distinct, self-contained argument. Additionally, create a dedicated conclusion that summarises your points and restates your thesis, rather than blending it with your final argument. Mastering this structure will allow your strong analytical content to be presented with greater clarity and impact, elevating your essays from 'Okay' to 'Excellent'. |
Not evaluated |
| ✓ |
overall.score
string Match: Exact equality |
Okay |
Okay |
Exact Match |
View Response Metadata
Finish Reason:
STOP
Avg Log Probability:
47.03%
Safety Rating:
N/A
Usage Metadata:
{
"trafficType": "ON_DEMAND",
"totalTokenCount": 8230,
"promptTokenCount": 4861,
"thoughtsTokenCount": 2773,
"promptTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 4861
}
],
"candidatesTokenCount": 596,
"candidatesTokensDetails": [
{
"modality": "TEXT",
"tokenCount": 596
}
]
}