Prompt Run Results

Project: Overall Essay Marker V1

Completed

← Back to Project View All Runs Start New Run

Run Summary

Prompt Version:

v1 - AI Instructions For Essay Analysis V1

AI Model:

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Duration:

42s

Created:

2026-02-01 01:08

Temperature:

0.0

Max Response Tokens:

8,192

Top-K:

Top-P:

Not set

Thinking Configuration:

8192 tokens

2

Total Items

2

Successful

0

Failed

2

Processed

Total Tokens: 17,251

Prompt Tokens: 10,777

Response Tokens: 1,168

Thoughts Tokens: 5,306

Avg Log Probability: 50.85%

Safety Ratings: N/A

Evaluation Summary

Field-by-field evaluation of generated vs expected output

Field Path	Type & Match Criterion	Total	Matches	Match Rate	Precision	Recall	F1	Similarity
`overall.score`	exact-match	2	1	50.0%	—	—	—	—

Responses for the Golden Items (2)

Click a field in the Evaluation Summary to view detailed comparisons

Angeline Business ↗ 100.0% · 1/1 fields matched

8,404 tokens

	Field & Match Criterion	Expected Output	Generated Output	Evaluation Metrics
—	`body.paragraphs.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	The body paragraphs are the weakest section of the essay. The structure does not consistently follow the TEEL (Topic sentence, Evidence, Elaboration, Link) model. The first body paragraph, for instance, lacks a clear, argumentative topic sentence and reads more like a general discussion than a focused argument. The second body paragraph is better structured with a clearer topic sentence, but both paragraphs suffer from a significant lack of evidence. Arguments are made logically but are not substantiated with societal-level examples, studies, or historical context, which makes them feel like unsupported assertions. To improve, focus on dedicating each paragraph to a single, clear argument and backing it up with specific evidence before elaborating on its significance.	Not evaluated
—	`body.paragraphs.score` string Not evaluated	null	Poor	Not evaluated
—	`conclusion.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	The conclusion effectively performs its function. It begins by clearly restating the essay's main contention in a new way, avoiding simple repetition. It then successfully synthesizes the main themes discussed—balancing technology, merit, and inclusion—before offering a powerful and humane final thought. The structure is logical and concise, providing a satisfying end to the essay by reinforcing the core message that a successful business must also be a humane one.	Not evaluated
—	`conclusion.score` string Not evaluated	null	Good	Not evaluated
—	`introduction.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	Your introduction is well-structured and effective. It starts with a relevant contextual hook, clearly establishes a nuanced contention that a business focused only on profit undermines its own success, and briefly outlines the arguments to be discussed. The contention is particularly strong as it thoughtfully synthesizes the themes from the prompts. The paragraph is also concise and clear, successfully setting the stage for the rest of the essay without wasting words. It correctly identifies the key components of a strong introduction.	Not evaluated
—	`introduction.score` string Not evaluated	null	Good	Not evaluated
—	`overall.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	This essay presents a thoughtful and coherent contention, framed by a good introduction and a solid conclusion. However, the overall quality is brought down by the weakness in the body paragraphs, which are the most critical component of a GAMSAT essay. The arguments in the body lack clear structure and are not supported by evidence, which prevents the essay from being truly persuasive. To improve, you should continue to formulate nuanced contentions as you have done here. Your main focus for improvement should be on the body paragraphs: 1) Strictly adhere to the TEEL structure for each paragraph. 2) Ensure each paragraph has one clear argument. 3) Substantiate your claims with specific, real-world evidence to add weight and credibility to your analysis.	Not evaluated
✓	`overall.score` string Match: Exact equality	Okay	Okay	Exact Match

View Response Metadata

Finish Reason:

STOP

Avg Log Probability:

45.23%

Safety Rating:

N/A

Usage Metadata:

{
  "trafficType": "ON_DEMAND",
  "totalTokenCount": 8404,
  "promptTokenCount": 4861,
  "thoughtsTokenCount": 2973,
  "promptTokensDetails": [
    {
      "modality": "TEXT",
      "tokenCount": 4861
    }
  ],
  "candidatesTokenCount": 570,
  "candidatesTokensDetails": [
    {
      "modality": "TEXT",
      "tokenCount": 570
    }
  ]
}

Science Essay ↗ 0.0% · 0/1 fields matched

8,847 tokens

	Field & Match Criterion	Expected Output	Generated Output	Evaluation Metrics
—	`body.paragraphs.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	The body paragraphs are exceptionally well-crafted, demonstrating a masterful use of the TEEL structure. Each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that directly supports one of the three arguments outlined in the introduction. The evidence provided, such as the references to Noam Chomsky, Sigmund Freud, and F.A. Hayek, is specific, relevant, and effectively integrated to support your claims. Most impressively, the elaboration in each paragraph is deep and logical, thoroughly explaining the 'how' and 'why' of your arguments rather than just stating them. The linking sentences neatly conclude each paragraph, reinforcing its main point and tying it back to the overall contention. The content is sophisticated and the structure is flawless.	Not evaluated
—	`body.paragraphs.score` string Not evaluated	null	Excellent	Not evaluated
—	`conclusion.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	Your conclusion is a model of efficiency and impact. It successfully restates your central contention and concisely summarises the three main arguments presented in the body paragraphs without introducing any new information. The final sentence, which calls for a change in perspective to allow the social sciences to flourish, provides a powerful and thought-provoking end to your piece. It perfectly encapsulates the essay's message and leaves a lasting impression on the reader. The structure is clear and the content provides a strong sense of finality.	Not evaluated
—	`conclusion.score` string Not evaluated	null	Excellent	Not evaluated
—	`introduction.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	Your introduction is superb. It begins with a strong contextual hook that immediately engages the reader by presenting a provocative thesis. You clearly state your contention—that applying the scientific method to social sciences is detrimental—and then provide a concise, numbered summary of the three arguments you will use to support it. This structure is exemplary, as it gives the reader a perfect roadmap for the rest of the essay. The content is sophisticated, and the entire introduction is succinct and impactful, staying well within the ideal word count. It perfectly sets the stage for the detailed analysis that follows.	Not evaluated
—	`introduction.score` string Not evaluated	null	Excellent	Not evaluated
—	`overall.feedback` string Not evaluated	null	This is an outstanding essay that demonstrates a high level of critical thinking and writing proficiency. The introduction is a model of clarity and conciseness, establishing a strong, nuanced contention and providing a clear roadmap for the essay. The body paragraphs are the highlight, perfectly executing the TEEL structure with sophisticated arguments and well-chosen evidence. The conclusion provides a powerful and effective summary. Your argument that the social sciences are hampered by a rigid application of the 'natural' scientific method is compelling and well-defended throughout. There is very little to improve upon; continue to apply this level of structural discipline and analytical depth in your writing. This is a benchmark example of a high-scoring GAMSAT essay.	Not evaluated
✗	`overall.score` string Match: Exact equality	Very Good	Excellent	Exact Match